Many families give teens a weekly allowance. Some require that the
teen perform household chores or maintain good grades in school.
Others simply give allowances to teach their child to be financially
responsible. Do you believe teens should receive allowances? Write a
letter to your local parents' association discussing your position and
backing it up with reasons.
Marlena wrote this claim in response to the prompt:
Teens should receive an allowance for completing weekly chores so
that they can learn responsibility and money-management skills.
Which statement best explains how effectively Marlena's claim responds to
the prompt?
A. The claim is effective because it clearly addresses the prompt and
gives a specific viewpoint.
B. The claim is effective because it addresses both sides of the
argument equally.
C. The claim is ineffective because although it gives a clear point of
view, it does not respond directly to the prompt.
D. The claim is ineffective because it focuses on a single piece of
factual information that does not address the prompt completely.

Answer:

CELL MEMBRANE

2. CELL WALL

3. GOLGI APPARATUS

4. RIBOSOMES

5. MITOCHONDIRA

6. CHLOROPLAST

7.  Endoplasmic reticulum

8. Nucleus

9. Golgi apparatus

10. Lysosome

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

this is grate i guess? i don;t know what to do here

Answer:

b) The author thinks that famous people can accredit their success to taking frequent naps.

Explanation:

In the given excerpt from "The Secret Truth About Napping", the author lists the numerous personalities in history who had taken naps. He argues that despite the claims of mid-day naps as detrimental, these famous men have still managed to produce one of the best discoveries and artworks in world history.

Citing Albert Einstein, Thomas Edison, Leonardo Da Vinci, etc. the author argues how taking naps helped these men to 'discover' what they are famous for now. And in that sense, it seems that the author thinks these famous people's success is in part because of the naps they took.

Thus, the correct answer is option b.

Answer: C.

Notes should correctly capture the key ideas of a text in the note-taker’s own words.

Answer:

Terms in this set (84) which sentence correctly uses the word clemency? the judge showed clemency when he sentenced the man to probation rather than jail time.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. The correct answer in this question is friends'.

2. The correct answer in this question is boxes'.

3. The correct answer in this question is houses'.

4. The fourth question is already correct.

5. The correct answer in this question is people's.

Explanation:

The possessive in English is formed by adding an apostrophe and an "s" to the singular noun. When the noun is in plural, we would add only the apostrophe if the noun ends in an "s," or the apostrophe+"s" if the noun ends in a different letter. Possessives show relationships of belonging between one thing and another.

Answer:

what are your options

Explanation:

Answer:

Reflection, absorption and re-emission.

To clarify, you mentioned light is not visible. Of course that is not true, we can see light. our retinas are sensitive to light within a certain range of frequencies. you may be commenting on the fact that if there is a beam of light in front of me traveling from right to left, I won’t see it. That’s true. If it were a ball I would see it. That is because light strikes the ball, is reflected, absorbed, and re-emitted or some combination of the above, then that light strikes my eye.

As a side note, if the ball were somehow changed by the light which struck it (change of course due to momentum of light impact) then I may not be able to trust that the image I see truly represents the current condition of the ball. But for most balls we can see, this is not the case. If, however, we do go smaller in our attempt to ‘see’ light, we won’t necessarily be able to trust our instinctive intuition. That is informed by the large scale world we observe with our unaided eye. We would have to learn to trust our observations however those observations come. And the observed truth of the very small, the world of quantum physics, is rather different than our unaided perception. It is nevertheless equally valid.

Back to the main point.

If you like to play the semantics game of asking whether you see the ball or see the light, suit yourself. The ball interacts with light, the light interacts with my eye, my eye sends data to my brain for interpretation. I’m fine with either version of ‘seeing’ the ball or ‘seeing’ the light.

Here’s an example to hopefully clarify.

I’m outside on a sunny day, no electric lights around, only sunlight. We all know sunlight is well collimated, one-directional. I’m in my back yard in the shade of my awning. No direct sunlight strikes me or the ball in my hand.

How do I see the ball in my hand?

Direct sunlight strikes a number of objects around me, the ground, my pool, etc. I don’t see any of that light. All of those objects reflect some light. That reflected light leaves the objects at certain limited angles based on the angle of incidence of the sunlight striking that surface. They also absorb some light. They then re-emit the light they absorb. Based on the surface characteristics, this re-emitted light shoots out in all directions away from the surface. They all become sources of multi-directional light nearby, just much lower intensity. Like a bunch of little light bulbs. So the ball I hold (in the awning’s shadow) is lit from a number of sources, just much more dimly than the ground lit by direct sunlight. And so the ball appears darker. It is in the shadow after all.

By the same principle, if the part of Earth you are standing on is in the shadow of the rest of the Earth, i.e. it is nighttime, then you won’t see anything. Unless of course there are other objects around Earth (moon, et al.) that absorb and re-emit light. When the sun, Earth, and moon are lined up so that the sunny side of the moon has a lot of its surface area facing towards Earth (full moon) then there is a lot of reflected and re-emited light striking Earth. Those are nights when it is easier to see by moonlight, which is of course sunlight.

Answer:

They look about right

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

Answer: A

Explanation:

The humanities frequently employ the MLA (Modern Language Association) style, particularly when discussing language and literature in writing.  Hence option A is correct .

Brief parenthetical citations in the text that point to an alphabetical list of books cited at the end of the work are used in MLA style.

The list of sources used in the research study is found on the Works Cited page. It ought to be on a separate page at the end of the document. Without using quotation marks, centre the title "Works Cited" at the top of the page. Title the page "Work Cited" if only one source was used.

When writing a research paper in MLA format, there are two different ways to cite each source: in-text parenthetical citations that are brief and a comprehensive reference list (bibliography) at the conclusion.of your essay.

Here is a direct quote, please include an in-text citation with the author's name and page number at the end (Smith 8). "This is an exact quote" ("Trouble" 22). At the conclusion of your in-text citation, a period should appear outside of the brackets.

Learn more about MLA here

https://brainly.com/question/12053489

#SPJ2

Explanation:

include bio-diesel, bio-decompose

Answer:

Check TedEd

Explanation:

Ive seen this before on that channel, it goes super in depth on it

Answer:

True

Explanation:

This is true! Even if a source is cited on the Works Cited page, it still needs to be cited within a text. If you don't provide in-text citations then it becomes unclear of which source is which within the body of your paper!

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

He was a traitor

Explanation:

Caesar was not an enemy of Rome.

Answer:

Brutus was a traitor.

Explanation:

Brutus was considered a friend to Rome but after the assassination he was consider a traitor for betraying Romes trust.

Answer:

Barrington's motivation has trickled onto his nonprofit organization, Experience Aviation. Not only does the program allow kids to build planes and learn about aviation, it allows them to gain a better understanding of math and science

Explanation:

Answer: oh

Explanation:

Answer:

A. modern times

Explanation:

:)

Answer: C. some time in the 1800s

The very first tennis racket was made at 1874 in London This racket was large, heavy, and made of solid wood, meaning it could deal some severe damage. This is why its c

Answer:

He wanted to have dinner without paying for it, so that he would be arrested.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. G

2. L

3. J

4. A

5. M

6. B

7. K

8. C

9. E

10. D

11. N

12. H

13. I

14. F

Explanation:

An idiom can be defined as a literary technique or device that is used in everyday language but it's not meant to be interpreted literally.

Basically, idioms are phrases that may be impossible to interpret or difficult to understand based on a loose translation of the words contained therein. Therefore, idioms shouldn't be interpreted literally but in a figurative sense.

Some examples of common idioms and there meaning include the following;

1. A white elephant: anything costly to maintain.

2. At daggers drawn: hostile relations.

3. Take after a person: to resemble.

4. Let the cat out of the bag: to reveal a secret by mistake.

5. Safe and sound: secure.

6. For ages: for a long time.

7. Black and white: in writing.

8. Off the record: unofficially.

9. Out of hand: out of control.

10. Bed of roses: easy or pleasant situation.

11. In the good books of: to enjoy the favor of somebody.

12. From A to Z: from beginning to end.

13. Crocodile tears: false grief.

14. A bone of connection: cause of dispute.

Answer:

It means that you would handle everything very harshly, almost like how you need to be aggressive when hammering a nail. The hammer is probably a metaphor for the temperament you use to handle things, if that makes sense.

Explanation:

Hope this helps ;) Let me know

Answer:

i read that passage its called the ravine so your probably in 6th grade well the answer is going down to the raveine made him feel unssetled and knowing the fact they did not find the boys body that it could be floating in the water at the very bottom and the boys mother said to not go to the ravine with starlene and his friends etc.

Explanation:

i hope i helped :)!

Answer:

what is it that you need help with exactly?

Explanation:

**don't worry, i'll go back and actually answer it**

Answer:

Harriet Tubman: Conductor on the Underground Railroad and The People Could Fly: American Black Folktales are similar, yet different. The first is an historical account of slavery in American history. The second is a fictional portrayal of the same topic or theme. Compare and contrast the two texts. Introduce your topic with a clear thesis statement. Then, organize and support your writing with specific evidence from both texts. Use transitions to show relationships among your ideas, and provide a conclusion that summarizes your main points.

Answer:

Explanation:

he gets wilbur back by offering him a bucket of food

Answer:

he lures wilbur into the pen with a pail of warm slops

Explanation:

Answer:

Apple is my favourite food because it can come in different colours, it is tasty and juicy, it fills you up if you need a snack, it is easy to carry around in your bag and it is healthy.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

the best way to rewrite this is to sayi was walking out the door and a butterfly went past me

Explanation:

Answer:

it would be the first choice

Explanation:

nothing else makes sense