If you can answer this u are the best

Answer:

So this angle is an acute angle so it would be around 60 so i think its D

Step-by-step explanation:

can i have brainliest

Answer:

Its width is 9.66 feet and length is 22.98 feet.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let l is length and b is width of a rectangular lot.

Length, l = (3b-6) feet

The area of the lot is 222 sq feet.

The area of a rectangle is given by :

[tex]A=lb\\\\222=(3b-6)b\\\\222=3b^2-6b[/tex]

It is a quadratic equation. The solution of the above equation is given by :

b = 9.66 feet and -7.66 feet

Neglecting negative answer, the width of the lot is 9.66 feet.

Length, l = (3(9.66)-6) = 22.98 feet

Hence, its width is 9.66 feet and length is 22.98 feet.

Answer:

70

Step-by-step explanation:

1-4 rounds down

5-9 rounds up

Answer: The answer is B. Because 3 multiplied by x and add it by 3 equates to y. example: (x=2) 3x2+3= y. y=9 .

The answer is not b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The margin of error is multiplied by 4.

Step-by-step explanation:

Margin of error is:

[tex]M = \frac{zs}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which z is related to the confidence level, s is elated to the standard deviation and n is the sample size.

From this, we have that the standard deviation is inversely proportional to the square root of the sample size.

If you cut the sample size in half:

The margin of error is inversely proportional to the square root of the sample size, so if you cut the sample size by [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex], the margin of error will be multiplied by [tex]2^2 = 4[/tex]

So

The margin of error is multiplied by 4.

Answer:

16.9

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use a proportion also in this case

51.6 : 23 = 38 : NO

NO = (38 x 23)/51.6 = 16.9

Answer:

13 and 16 for the first question and the second part i dont know sorry

Step-by-step explanation:

The median is the line in the center of the box

Answer:

We reject the Null and conclude that the mean costs of a meal at fast food restaurants in two different cities are different.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

City n x s

A 26 $4.05 $0.55

B 32 $5.15 $0.85

H0 : μ1 - μ2 = 0

H0 : μ1 - μ2 ≠ 0

n1 = 26 ; x1 = 4.05 ; s1 = 0.55

n2 = 32 ; x2 = 5.15 ; s2 = 0.85

Tstatistic :

(x1 - x2) / √(s1²/n1 + s2²/n2)

(4.05 - 5.15) / √(0.55²/26 + 0.85²/32)

-1.1 / 0.1849668

= - 5.947

Using the smaller n;

df = n - 1 ; 26 - 1 = 25

Pvalue = (-5.947, 24)

Pvalue = 0.000001

Since Pvalue < α ; We reject the Null and conclude that the mean costs of a meal at fast food restaurants in two different cities are different.

Answer:

55.5 is the I guess........

Answer:

B. The graph would shift 5 units up.

Step-by-step explanation:

Before the change:

Before the change, the function was given by:

[tex]y = x^2 - 3[/tex]

After the change:

After the change, the function was given by:

[tex]y = x^2 + 2[/tex]

Considering the function as it was before the change, it can also be written as:

[tex]y = x^2 - 3 + 5[/tex]

Which means that 5 was added to the function, and when a number n is added to a function, there function is shifted n units up. So the correct answer to this problem is given by option B.

Answer:

48 ft 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8.75

Step-by-step explanation:

3.5(2.5)

Answer:

8.75

Step-by-step explanation:

3.5(2.5)

Answer: a. a paired analysis is appropriate

b. a paired analysis is not appropriate

Step-by-step explanation:

The paired analysis sometimes is refered to as a statistical procedure which is used to know if the mean difference that exist between two observations is zero or not. It should be noted that in a paired analysis, each subject is measured twice, and this beings about the pairs of observations.

a. Here, the paired analysis is appropriate due to the fact that similar measurement which are the calories are taken for several days for both the vegetarian and the non vegetarian such are two pairs of sample.

b) In this case, the paired analysis is not appropriate. Here, the pairs of samples don't undergo identical treatment.

Answer:

D) y=-5/2x; y=-20

Step-by-step explanation:

If y varies directly with x, then y=kx where k is our proportionality constant

Therefore, since y=-5 when x=2, we have -5=k(2) where k=-5/2

This means that when x=8, y=(-5/2)(8)=-20, making choice D correct

Note that the number of eggs the above-described trader bought is 180 eggs. This is solved using simple arithmetic.

Let no. of the eggs be x, then

Money the trader paid for eggs = 64/12x = 16/3x

The money the trader got from

Seling two third eggs =2/3x*240/30

=16/3x

Money get from one third= x/3*225/30

=5/2

Profit= [16/3x+5/2x] - 16/3x

5/2x = 450

x =450*2/5

=180

Therefore, the number of eggs that the trader bought is 180.

Learn more about arithmetic:

https://brainly.com/question/11424589

#SPJ1

Answer:

Capitalism

Step-by-step explanation:

It's characterised by private ownership of the means of production.

Answer:

The simplest way to prove that triangles are congruent is to prove that all three sides of the triangle are congruent. When all the sides of two triangles are congruent, the angles of those triangles must also be congruent. This method is called side-side-side, or SSS for short.

Answer:13

Step-by-step explanation:It is 13 because the mode is the number that is repeated the most.

Answer:8 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

is the answer 200/3 Or 66.667 ft

Answer:

a=15

b=7

c=4

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\sqrt[4]{15^{7} } = 15^{\frac{7}{4} }[/tex]

Answer:

Desmos is Function Calculator is a great tool for this, the correct answer is z= 7/3

7/3= 2.333~ and so √(3*2.333~) + 2= 2.9999999833333~

Now 7- 2.9999999833333~= 4.0000000166667~ but I don't know the true infinate sign for this so thats why my numbers look a little weird, just plug (7/3) in for z and you will get 4, trust me

Step-by-step explanation:

MRK ME BRAINLIEST PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz

Answer:

407

Step-by-step explanation:

Using PEMDAS, we get that (2x27) ÷ 2 + (95x4)

54÷2+380

27+380

407

Answer:

4.8

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] V_{sphere} = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 [/tex]

[tex] 144\pi= \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 [/tex]

[tex]r^3 = \frac {3 \times 144\pi}{4\pi}[/tex]

[tex]r^3 = 3 \times 36[/tex]

[tex]r^3 = 108[/tex]

[tex]r = \sqrt[3]{108} \\ \\ r = 4.7622031559 \\ \\ r \approx \: 4.8 \: [/tex]

If you need an estimate for #5, then you can round each value to the nearest whole number to have...

Add up those values: 21+21+19+19 = 80

-------------------

Another estimate you could do is to round everything to 20, since we're close to this value. Having four copies of 20 added leads to 20+20+20+20 = 80

So they rode a total estimated amount of 80 miles

--------------------

The actual total is:  21.6+20.9+19.4+18.5 = 80.4 miles, which isn't too far off from 80.

Answer:

hope this will help you more