Answer:
The farm bill is an expansive piece of legislation that provides funding for commodity programs, conservation, trade, nutrition, credit, rural development, research, forestry, energy, horticulture, organic agriculture, livestock, crop insurance, disaster assistance programs and tax provisions The farm bill is typically passed every five years. The 2008 Farm bill expired on September 30, 2012. Congress extended the 2008 bill for one more year, which caused controversy over the 2013-2014 Farm Bill.
The vast majority of the $1 trillion farm bill was nutrition--roughly 75% of the total bill. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) made up about 72% of the nutrition budget. Crop insurance was the second largest budgetary expense.
Nutrition and federal spending were in the cross hairs of the farm bill debate. Republicans sought cuts to the food assistance programs and Democrats were concerned with crop insurance fraud. In an effort to push through some type of farm bill, the House attempted to split food stamps from farm policy and create two separate bills in September 2013. This would have been the first time since 1973 that food stamps split from farm policy. Despite the split bill being passed in the House, it stalled in the Senate in September 2013.
After the first round of debate in September 2013, Congress did not revisit the bill until early 2014. On January 29, 2014, the U.S. House approved the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013, H.R. 2642, also known as the Farm Bill. The bill passed by a vote of 251-166. The nearly 1,000-page bill reformed and continued various programs of the Department of Agriculture through 2018. The $1 trillion bill expanded crop insurance for farmers by $7 billion over the next decade and created new subsidies for rice and peanut growers that would kick in when prices drop. However, cuts to the food stamp program cut an average of $90 per month for 1.7 million people in 15 states. On February 4, 2014, the Democratic controlled Senate approved the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013, H.R. 2642, also known as the Farm Bill.
What does the word deadlock mean?
What is meant by the phrase "whitewashed" when used in terms of the
media?
Answer:
in the media "whitewashed" means to make a darker skined person lighter or a darker skined person acting like a white person
Answer: Most of the people portrayed in the media are white
Explanation: got it right on the quiz have a good day! c:
Plzzz help me out this is due soon in like 15 mins
Answer:
c
Explanation:
In what way does the Texas Constitution include the principle of federalism?
A.) Texas is able to have its own treasury and print its own currency
B.) Texas is able to decide on policies which are not covered in the US Constitution
C.) Texas is able to make treaties with other countries
D.) Texas is able to have representatives who serve in both the Texas House of Representatives as well as the US house of Representatives at the same time
Answer:
I think your answer would be B.)
Explanation:
hope this helps
sorry if wrong
9. How did Jeroboam lead his people away from God?
It began with the Age of the Judges, when Israel was a loose conglomerate of tribes, led by local judges. This led into the 120-year period of the united kingdom, when the 12 tribes were united together under a secession of monarchs (Saul, David, and Solomon). And then the country was split into two separate kingdoms, the southern nation of Judah, led by the Davidic kings, and the northern nation of Israel.
The king responsible for tearing the northern tribes away from the southern tribes was Jeroboam. He, with God’s blessing, successfully led a rebellion against Solomon’s son Rehoboam. However, despite God’s grace in his life, Jeroboam was not a faithful follower of God. Indeed, the Old Testament scriptures make it clear that following his coronation, Jeroboam quickly led the northern tribes into great sin and apostasy.
Jeroboam’s sins are spoken about in no uncertain terms. During Jeroboam’s life, it was prophesied that God would abandon Israel, “because of the sins of Jeroboam, who sinned and who made Israel sin.” (1 Kings 14:16) Later, when other kings of Israel sinned, it would be said about them that they did “evil in the sight of the Lord, and walked in the way of Jeroboam, and in his sin by which he had made Israel sin.” (1 Kings 15:34, 16:19, 16:26, etc.)
So what was the sin of Jeroboam? What was this great evil that he committed that doomed the northern nation of Israel to destruction, having made it forever unclean in the sight of God? Essentially, Jeroboam changed the worship God had commanded under the Law of Moses.
God had established a certain priesthood of the line of Aaron the Levite (cf. Exodus 28:1). He had established a pattern of worship in a single location, that location being originally the Tabernacle, and then later the Temple at Jerusalem. God had ordained that at the single altar consecrated under the Law, the Israelites should worship and make sacrifices to Him. He had further commanded that the Israelites, in their religion, never try to make a statue, or graven image, of Him; nor that they should ever worship or bow down to the same. (cf. Exodus 20:4-5) It is important to note that this command is distinct from the command not to worship other gods. (cf. Exodus 20:3)
Jeroboam, however, understanding that the Temple of God was in the southern nation of Judah, the nation he had split off of; and being of such little faith as to trust God to work things out for him; he decided that the wise course of action would be to build a new temple. Two actually, one in Bethel, on the border with Judah, and another in the northern city of Dan. (cf. 1 Kings 12:25-28). He went a step further and consecrated new priests, who were not Levites (1 Kings 12:31). He then made up new religious holidays (cf. 1 Kings 12:32-33).
We should note that in all of this, Jeroboam kept a semblance of remaining true to the religious heritage of his people. He continued to call on the name of God. He continued to believe in the exodus out of Egypt, and the nations salvation from slavery (cf. 1 Kings 12:28). There is even evidence that the northern nation continued to observe the sabbath day, and other such ceremonial customs from the Law. (cf. Amos 8:5). But still, in changing a part of God’s law, Jeroboam was held, by God, to be guilty of a great sin. God did not want His people to add to His word, or take away from His word, and He certainly did not want them deliberately breaking His commands to suit themselves (cf. Deuteronomy 5:32).
Christians today are not under the Law of Moses; we are under the Law of Christ (cf. Romans 8:2; Galatians 6:2) but the principle remains — God does not want us changing what He has given us (cf. Revelation 22:18-19; Galatians 1:8-9) We cannot simply add new offices to the church, create councils, holidays, manners of worship and the like. When we take what God has given us in Christ, and change it to suit ourselves, we are, like the kings of old, walking in the sins of Jeroboam, who made Israel to sin. Rather we must be true to the Gospel of Christ, without adding to it, or taking away from it. We must learn to speak where the Bible speaks and to be silent where the Bible is silent, lest, like Jeroboam we bring condemnation on ourselves.
Explanation:
Who led the fight against the Seleudd rule
Answer:
The Maccabean Revolt (Hebrew: מרד החשמונאים ) was a Jewish rebellion, lasting from 167 to 160 BCE, led by the Maccabees against the Seleucid Empire and the Hellenistic influence on Jewish life.
Explanation:
Name one modern day country that used to be part of the British Empire in Asia.
a. China
b. Japan
c. India
Answer:
The British Indian Empire included the regions of present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, and, in addition, at various times, Aden (from 1858 to 1937), Lower Burma (from 1858 to 1937), Upper Burma (from 1886 to 1937) (Burma was detached from British India in 1937), British Somaliland (briefly from 1884 to 1898),
Explanation:
The British Indian Empire included the regions of present-day India,
why do you think people found hitler's rhetoric so persuasive
Answer:
This is just a sample answer, but you can change it in whatever way suits best. :)
It is believed that the audience was persuaded by his speech due to desperation and the need for a leader or role model. Hitler played that role in order to get what he wanted. In addition, Hitler knew to use his resources such as, propaganda, rhetoric, and false hope in order to get get what he wanted.
Adolf Hitler was successful in persuasion of people, as he was also able to influence people into bringing them to believe what he wanted the German society to achieve under his leadership.
What is the significance of Adolf Hitler?Adolf Hitler is highly remembered as a famous dictator of the Germany who led Germany into the Second World War. He became an absolute dictator and made several extraordinary developments in the society under his leadership.
The speeches delivered by Adolf Hitler were influential enough to be able to persuade people, because the tone in which he spoke made the people to believe what he wanted to achieve along with them in Germany under his leadership.
Therefore, the significance of Adolf Hitler has been aforementioned.
Learn more about Adolf Hitler here:
https://brainly.com/question/3905550
#SPJ2
PLEASE HELP ME!!
How should we interpret who had status during the time of the constitution?
Answer:
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"-These words, written above the main entrance to the Supreme Court Building, express the ultimate responsibility of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court is "distinctly American in concept and function," as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed. Few other courts in the world have the same authority of constitutional interpretation and none have exercised it for as long or with as much influence. A century and a half ago, the French political observer Alexis de Tocqueville noted the unique position of the Supreme Court in the history of nations and of jurisprudence. "The representative system of government has been adopted in several states of Europe," he remarked, "but I am unaware that any nation of the globe has hitherto organized a judicial power in the same manner as the Americans. . . . A more imposing judicial power was never constituted by any people."
The unique position of the Supreme Court stems, in large part, from the deep commitment of the American people to the Rule of Law and to constitutional government. The United States has demonstrated an unprecedented determination to preserve and protect its written Constitution, thereby providing the American "experiment in democracy" with the oldest written Constitution still in force.
The Constitution of the United States is a carefully balanced document. It is designed to provide for a national government sufficiently strong and flexible to meet the needs of the republic, yet sufficiently limited and just to protect the guaranteed rights of citizens; it permits a balance between society’s need for order and the individual’s right to freedom. To assure these ends, the Framers of the Constitution created three independent and coequal branches of government. That this Constitution has provided continuous democratic government through the periodic stresses of more than two centuries illustrates the genius of the American system of government.
The complex role of the Supreme Court in this system derives from its authority to invalidate legislation or executive actions which, in the Court’s considered judgment, conflict with the Constitution. This power of "judicial review" has given the Court a crucial responsibility in assuring individual rights, as well as in maintaining a "living Constitution" whose broad provisions are continually applied to complicated new situations.
While the function of judicial review is not explicitly provided in the Constitution, it had been anticipated before the adoption of that document. Prior to 1789, state courts had already overturned legislative acts which conflicted with state constitutions. Moreover, many of the Founding Fathers expected the Supreme Court to assume this role in regard to the Constitution; Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, for example, had underlined the importance of judicial review in the Federalist Papers, which urged adoption of the Constitution.
Hamilton had written that through the practice of judicial review the Court ensured that the will of the whole people, as expressed in their Constitution, would be supreme over the will of a legislature, whose statutes might express only the temporary will of part of the people. And Madison had written that constitutional interpretation must be left to the reasoned judgment of independent judges, rather than to the tumult and conflict of the political process. If every constitutional question were to be decided by public political bargaining, Madison argued, the Constitution would be reduced to a battleground of competing factions, political passion and partisan spirit.
Despite this background the Court’s power of judicial review was not confirmed until 1803, when it was invoked by Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison. In this decision, the Chief Justice asserted that the Supreme Court's responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary consequence of its sworn duty to uphold the Constitution. That oath could not be fulfilled any other way. "It is emphatically the province of
What gave america the right to intervene in Cuban affairs
A. Monroe doctrine
B. Platt amendment
C. Square deal
Answer:
B. Platt amendment
Explanation:
This poem was a literary contribution from the
A Great Awakening
B Great Migration
C South Side Renaissance
D Harlem Renaissance
Answer:
the great migration....,..............
Someone Answer pls Need HEELLPP!!!! and if you can answer my other question in my profile ill give you brainlest.
Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín led the:
A. Mexican independence movement.
B. unification of Italy.
C. South American independence movement.
D. French Revolution.
Answer:
The two leading figures of the South American wars of independence were Simon Bolivar in the north and José de San Martín in the south.
So, C is the answer.
Explanation:
Choose the answer that fits with the statement below.
Amazon River: Argentina
sydney please help
Peru
Antarctica
Brazil
Answer:
Sydney : Antarctica
Explanation:
Both the Amazon River and Argentina are in the Western Hemisphere. (Along with Peru and Brazil) And, Sydney and Antartica are both in the Eastern Hemisphere. This analogy deals with location :)
The French Revolution freed France from the traditional Monarchial System.
Answer:
what are you asking?
Explanation:
After the war, what was the South's most valuable asset?
A. Land
B. Slaves
C. Factories
D. Railroads
Answer:
A. Land
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Land
Explanation:
After the war, the land was the South's most valuable asset, and arguments raged over who should control it. Hope this helped :)
10) What happened after Kennedy and Khrushchev met in Vienna in 1961?
The United States ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall.
Cold War tensions increased.
The United States agreed to give West Berlin to the Soviet Union.
O The United States installed a telephone 'hot line that reached MOSCOW
Answer:
the answer is B) cold war tension increased
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Have a nice day :)
2. Why was the United States flying U-2s over the Soviet Union?
Answer:
Alarmed over rapid developments in military technology by his Communist rivals in the USSR, President Dwight D. ... High-altitude U-2 spy planes began making reconnaissance flights over the USSR in 1956, giving the U.S. its first detailed look at Soviet military facilitie
Answer:
The United States was worried about their power and if the Soviets had a bigger military force.
Explanation:
Which group stood to benefit the most from gaining independence from Mexico? Question 6 options: Tejanos Enslaved People Native Americans Texians
The group that benefited the most from gaining independence from Mexico are the Tejanos who were the former Americans and has now become the American citizens and had claimed for the American rights and privileges.
PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS!!!!!!!
Answer:
1. Maurya Empire
3. Alexandrian Empire
4. Chandragupta Maurya
WWI was the first time in history that happened
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
theres only one ww1
Which steps to organizing a nonviolent campaign does King describe? Check all that apply. deciding whether laws are unfair talking with local officials refusing to be jailed or imprisoned holding peaceful protests for change fighting back against white resistance learning how to protest in a nonviolent way
Answer: Which steps to organizing a nonviolent campaign does King describe? Check all that apply. A, B, D, F
A. deciding whether laws are unfair
B. talking with local officials
C. refusing to be jailed or imprisoned
D. holding peaceful protests for change
E. fighting back against white resistance
F. learning how to protest in a nonviolent way
Explanation:
In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: (1) Collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive, (2) Negotiation, (3) Self-purification and (4) Direct Action. We have gone through all of these steps in Birmingham. There can be no gainsaying of the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of police brutality is known in every section of this country. Its unjust treatment of Negroes in the courts is a notorious reality. There have been more unsolved bombings of Negro homes and churches in Birmingham than any other city in this nation. These are the hard, brutal and unbelievable facts. On the basis of these conditions Negro leaders sought to negotiate with the city fathers. But the political leaders consistently refused to engage in good faith negotiation.
–“Letter from Birmingham Jail,”
Martin Luther King Jr.
The steps to organizing a nonviolent campaign does King describe are:
deciding whether laws are unfairtalking with local officialsholding peaceful protests for changelearning how to protest in a nonviolent way. Thus, option (a), (b) (d) and (f) is correct. What is campaign?The campaign goal, aim, or purpose specifies what has to change and to what extent in order to address the campaign's problem. The goal should ideally fit into a simple, brief line and be planned in such a manner that all campaign participants fully understand it.
There was a nonviolent movement focusing on determining whether laws are discriminatory, holding peaceful rallies for reform, learning how to protest nonviolently, and meeting with local leaders. This is based on a nonviolent campaign.
Therefore, option (a), (b) (d) and (f) is correct.
Learn more about on campaign, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28568817
#SPJ5
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
A. deciding whether laws are unfair
B. talking with local officials
C. refusing to be jailed or imprisoned
D. holding peaceful protests for change
E. fighting back against white resistance
F. learning how to protest in a nonviolent way
Which of the following represents a high cost decision?
A) choosing between plaving soccer or playing video games
B) choosing benveen eating ice cream and eating broccoli
C) choosing benveen buying a car or buying a house
D). choosing between taking a shower or taking a bath
Answer:
the letter c is the most expensive of them all
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Should the United States engaged in imperialism ?
Answer:
No, that would go against the freedoms and liberty of other nations.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The US has significant effects on other countries in terms of pop culture, technology, business practices, and more. However, the gravity of how much influence America has on other governments is evident in American Imperialism, which is the military, economic, and cultural influence of the US on other lands, usually going hand-in-hand with expansion on a grand scale into other territories.
The burning question is, “Does the constitution follow the flag?” and the answer is a resounding no. When they were conquered, the American territories did not enjoy the same rights that Americans in the mainland did. The US government operated on the idea that the peoples of these newly acquired lands were inferior to Americans, and thus not capable of holding the responsibilities of a mainland American citizen.
There are many pros and cons to American imperialism. One positive for the US is that it expands territories. The more territories you have, the greater power you have. It gives access to many resources, and presently the US dominates over Guam, Puerto Rico, Samoa, The Northern Mariana Islands, and the US Virgin Islands. Imperialism also gives a boost to the economy, not just for the United States who uses the resources for trade, but for the territory itself. The United States brings technology, industries, government policies, and privileges American citizens possess to these territories. Also, the US has many military bases around the world, and in return the US aids these territories with protection.
However, there are many cons that follow American imperialism. American imperialism kills the tradition of the indigenous peoples, who lose their identity and tradition. In many cases, the territories’ own people grow to discriminate against what is local and originally of their own native culture.
Additionally, it can be argued that the possession of territories is not necessary and perhaps even counterintuitive, as the US spends so much money on bases scattered around the world and helping the economy of those islands. They are expensive to keep, and the US is already quite expansive.
American people talk so much about freedom and have fought a war over it, but the American territories don’t even have full freedom. The United States controls the islands and they cannot act on their own. The people there are expected to follow American culture or risk discrimination on social and economic playing fields.
How do you feel about American Imperialism?
what is something you could study that might help others?
Which is the 3rd party that wants a government that only protects our freedoms?
A.) libertarian
B.) green
C.) socialist
D.) communist
Answer:
A.) libertarian
Explanation:
What type of government emerged in Russia after Lenin came to power?
A communist state emerged in Russia
Why did some reformers turn to the issue of women’s rights?
The improved iron smelting process made steel stronger for the building of this:
A.Windmills
B.Railtoads
C.Coal Cars
D.Weapons
Answer:
B. Railroads
Explanation:
If they built stronger and better railroads then they could bring in more supplies that they might need.
Stalinism (Communism)
Who has control of the government?
How did Florence
become the beautiful
and important city
that it is today?
Answer: Florence is often named as the birthplace of the Renaissance. The early writers and artists of the period sprung from this city in the northern hills of Italy. As a center for the European wool trade, the political power of the city rested primarily in the hands of the wealthy merchants who dominated the industry.
Explanation: