A non-violent example of protest used in the American colonies during the American Revolution.

Tarring and feathering
Boston Tea Party
Boston Massacre
Boycotting goods

Answer: its c

Explanation:

Answer:The Matamoros Expedition have fate as Mexican troops defeated the Texan force attempting to capture the port.

Answer: Option D

Explanation:

Matamoros Expedition was an invasion by rebellious Texans in the year 1836 for capturing the port town of Matamoros which was under the control of Mexicans. The Matamoros port had great strategic as well as economic value to both Mexico as well as Texas.

The Texan revolution was quite controversial as there was the division between the Governor and the General Council on the issue that whether they should remain faithful to the constitution or declare their freedom from the Mexico. This division has great impact on the revolution as ultimately the expedition led to the defeat of Texan force in 1836.

Explanation:

Answer:

Texans cancelled the expedition because a large Mexican army was marching north.

Explanation:

Fannin made some poor decisions that made his army pretty much suffer.

I got a 90 on the k12 test but I got this one correct.

Answer: Loyalists

Explanation:

Loyalists were American colonists who remained loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolutionary War, often referred to as Tories, Royalists or King's Men at the time. They were opposed by the Patriots, who supported the revolution, and called them "persons inimical to the liberties of America."[1]

Prominent Loyalists repeatedly assured the British government that many thousands of them would spring to arms and fight for the crown. The British government acted in expectation of that, especially in the southern campaigns in 1780–81. Britain was able to effectively protect the people only in areas where they had military control, and in return, the number of military Loyalists was significantly lower than what had been expected. Due to the conflicting political views, loyalists were often under suspicion of those in the British military, who did not know whom they could fully trust in such a conflicted situation; they were often looked down upon.[2]

Patriots watched suspected Loyalists very closely and would not tolerate any organized Loyalist opposition. Many outspoken or militarily active Loyalists were forced to flee, especially to their stronghold of New York City. William Franklin, the royal governor of New Jersey and son of Patriot leader Benjamin Franklin, became the leader of the Loyalists after his release from a Patriot prison in 1778. He worked to build Loyalist military units to fight in the war. Woodrow Wilson wrote that "there had been no less than twenty-five thousand loyalists enlisted in the British service during the five years of the fighting. At one time (1779) they had actually outnumbered the whole of the continental muster under the personal command of Washington."[3]

When their cause was defeated, about 15 percent of the Loyalists (65,000–70,000 people) fled to other parts of the British Empire, to Britain itself, or to British North America (now Canada).[4] The southern Loyalists moved mostly to Florida, which had remained loyal to the Crown, and to British Caribbean possessions. Northern Loyalists largely migrated to Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. They called themselves United Empire Loyalists. Most were compensated with Canadian land or British cash distributed through formal claims procedures. Loyalists who left the US received over £3 million or about 37% of their losses from the British government. Loyalists who stayed in the US were generally able to retain their property and become American citizens.[5] Many Loyalists eventually returned to the US after the war and discriminatory laws had been repealed.[6] Historians have estimated that between 15 and 20% of the 2,000,000 whites in the colonies in 1775 were Loyalists (300,000–400,000).[7]

#SPJ1